[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130930081511.GB23756@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:15:11 +0100
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre@...rep.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
libvir-list@...hat.com, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: qemu, numa: non-contiguous cpusets
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:10:44PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Btw,
>
> while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we
> feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus
> for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for
> example:
>
> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 8 -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0\;2\;4-5 -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=1\;3\;6-7
>
> The ';' needs to be escaped from the shell but I'm open for better
> suggestions.
Use a ':' instead.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists