[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52493EC6.4020403@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:05:10 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre@...rep.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
libvir-list@...hat.com, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@...hat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: qemu, numa: non-contiguous cpusets
Il 29/09/2013 17:10, Borislav Petkov ha scritto:
> Btw,
>
> while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we
> feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus
> for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for
> example:
>
> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 8 -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0\;2\;4-5 -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=1\;3\;6-7
I think there are already patches on the list to do that, as part of the
NUMA memory binding series from Wanlong Gao.
Paolo
> The ';' needs to be escaped from the shell but I'm open for better
> suggestions.
>
> Here's a diff:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> index 4e709d5c1c20..82a6c8451fb0 100644
> --- a/vl.c
> +++ b/vl.c
> @@ -1261,9 +1261,27 @@ char *get_boot_devices_list(size_t *size)
> return list;
> }
>
> +static int __numa_set_cpus(unsigned long *map, int start, int end)
> +{
> + if (end >= MAX_CPUMASK_BITS) {
> + end = MAX_CPUMASK_BITS - 1;
> + fprintf(stderr,
> + "qemu: NUMA: A max of %d VCPUs are supported\n",
> + MAX_CPUMASK_BITS);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (end < start) {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + bitmap_set(map, start, end-start+1);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void numa_node_parse_cpus(int nodenr, const char *cpus)
> {
> - char *endptr;
> + char *endptr, *ptr = (char *)cpus;
> unsigned long long value, endvalue;
>
> /* Empty CPU range strings will be considered valid, they will simply
> @@ -1273,7 +1291,8 @@ static void numa_node_parse_cpus(int nodenr, const char *cpus)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (parse_uint(cpus, &value, &endptr, 10) < 0) {
> +fromthetop:
> + if (parse_uint(ptr, &value, &endptr, 10) < 0) {
> goto error;
> }
> if (*endptr == '-') {
> @@ -1282,22 +1301,22 @@ static void numa_node_parse_cpus(int nodenr, const char *cpus)
> }
> } else if (*endptr == '\0') {
> endvalue = value;
> - } else {
> - goto error;
> - }
> + } else if (*endptr == ';') {
> + if (__numa_set_cpus(node_cpumask[nodenr], value, value) < 0) {
> + goto error;
> + }
> + endptr++;
> + if (*endptr == '\0')
> + return;
>
> - if (endvalue >= MAX_CPUMASK_BITS) {
> - endvalue = MAX_CPUMASK_BITS - 1;
> - fprintf(stderr,
> - "qemu: NUMA: A max of %d VCPUs are supported\n",
> - MAX_CPUMASK_BITS);
> - }
> + ptr = endptr;
>
> - if (endvalue < value) {
> + goto fromthetop;
> + } else {
> goto error;
> }
>
> - bitmap_set(node_cpumask[nodenr], value, endvalue-value+1);
> + __numa_set_cpus(node_cpumask[nodenr], value, endvalue);
> return;
>
> error:
> --
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists