[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1310011545310.14977@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@...bao.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OOM killer: wait for tasks with pending SIGKILL to
exit
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Sergey Dyasly wrote:
> If you are ok with the first change in my patch regarding fatal_signal_pending,
> I can send new patch with just that change.
>
The entire patch is pointless, there's no need to give access to memory
reserves simply because it is PF_EXITING. If it needs memory, it will
call the oom killer itself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists