[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131001083426.GB27484@concordia>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:34:26 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, gleb@...hat.com,
agraf@...e.de, mpm@...enic.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S: Add support for hwrng found on
some powernv systems
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:06:59AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 26/09/2013 08:31, Michael Ellerman ha scritto:
> > Some powernv systems include a hwrng. Guests can access it via the
> > H_RANDOM hcall.
>
> Is there any reason to do this in the kernel?
It's less code, and it's faster :)
> It does not have to be a particularly fast path;
Sure, but do we have to make it slow on purpose?
> on x86, we are simply forwarding /dev/hwrng or
> /dev/random data to the guest. You can simply use virtio-rng.
Not all guests support virtio-rng.
> If you really want to have the hypercall, implementing it in QEMU means
> that you can support it on all systems, in fact even when running
> without KVM.
Sure, I can add a fallback to /dev/hwrng for full emulation.
> The QEMU command line would be something like "-object
> rng-random,filename=/dev/random,id=rng0 -device spapr-rng,rng=rng0".
We can't use /dev/random like that. The PAPR specification, which is
what we're implementing, implies that H_RANDOM provides data from a
hardware source.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists