[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131001083615.GC27484@concordia>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:36:15 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, gleb@...hat.com, agraf@...e.de,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
mpm@...enic.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S: Add support for hwrng found on
some powernv systems
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:45:45PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 12:01 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > +int powernv_hwrng_present(void)
> > +{
> > + return __raw_get_cpu_var(powernv_rng) != NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static unsigned long rng_whiten(struct powernv_rng *rng, unsigned long val)
> > {
> > unsigned long parity;
> > @@ -42,6 +48,17 @@ static unsigned long rng_whiten(struct powernv_rng *rng, unsigned long val)
> > return val;
> > }
> >
> > +int powernv_get_random_real_mode(unsigned long *v)
> > +{
> > + struct powernv_rng *rng;
> > +
> > + rng = __raw_get_cpu_var(powernv_rng);
> > +
> > + *v = rng_whiten(rng, in_rm64(rng->regs_real));
> > +
>
> Will it be in_be64() instead of in_rm64() ? Its failing the build here. Except this
> all individual patches build correctly.
No it's definitely not in_be64() - that will checkstop your machine :)
I added in_rm64() in a previous patch, "Add real mode cache inhibited
IO accessors" - I just didn't want to spam the KVM guys with those
patches as well.
Thanks for the review & testing.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists