lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1380728283-61038-1-git-send-email-tmac@hp.com>
Date:	Wed,  2 Oct 2013 09:38:02 -0600
From:	T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@...com>
To:	tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	aswin@...com, aswin_proj@...ts.hp.com,
	T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] fs/ext4: increase parallelism in updating ext4 orphan list

Instead of allowing only a single atomic update (both in memory and on disk
orphan lists) of an ext4's orphan list via the s_orphan_lock mutex, this patch
allows multiple updates of the orphan list, while still maintaing the
integrity of both the in memory and on disk orphan lists of each update.

This is accomplished by using a per inode mutex to serialize the oprhan
list update of a single inode, and a mutex and a spinlock to serailize
the on disk and in memory orphan list respectively.

Here are some of the becnhmark results with the changes.

On a 90 core machine:

Here are the performance improvements in some of the aim7 workloads,

---------------------------
|             | % increase |
---------------------------
| alltests    |      9.56  |
---------------------------
| custom      |     12.20  |
---------------------------
| fserver     |     15.99  |
---------------------------
| new_dbase   |      1.73  |
---------------------------
| new_fserver |     17.56  |
---------------------------
| shared      |      6.24  |
---------------------------
For Swingbench dss workload,

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Users         | 100  | 200  | 300  | 400  | 500  | 600  | 700  | 800  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| % imprvoment  | 7.67 | 9.43 | 7.30 | 0.58 | 0.53 |-2.62 |-3.72 | 3.77 |
| without using |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |
| shared memory |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

On a 8 core machine:

Here are the performance date from some of the aim7 workloads,

---------------------------
|             | % increase |
---------------------------
| alltests    |      3.90  |
---------------------------
| custom      |      1.66  |
---------------------------
| dbase       |     -2.00  |
---------------------------
| fserver     |      1.80  |
---------------------------
| new_dbase   |     -1.90  |
---------------------------
| new_fserver |      2.18  |
---------------------------
| shared      |      7.46  |
---------------------------
For Swingbench dss workload,

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Users         | 100  | 200  | 300  | 400  | 500  | 600  | 700  | 800  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| % imprvoment  |-1.32 | 6.45 | 1.18 |-3.13 |-1.13 | 4.68 | 5.75 |-0.37 |
| without using |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |
| shared memory |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

T Makphaibulchoke (2):
  fs/ext4: adding and initalizing new members of ext4_inode_info and
    ext4_sb_info
  fs/ext4/namei.c: reducing contention on s_orphan_lock mmutex

 fs/ext4/ext4.h  |   5 +-
 fs/ext4/inode.c |   1 +
 fs/ext4/namei.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 fs/ext4/super.c |   4 +-
 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.11.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ