[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131002153842.GD32181@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 17:38:42 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
infinipath <infinipath@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/26] ib: Convert qib_get_user_pages() to
get_user_pages_unlocked()
On Wed 02-10-13 15:32:47, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
> > > The risk of GUP fast is the loss of the "force" arg on GUP fast, which
> > > I don't see as significant give our use case.
> > Yes. I was discussing with Roland some time ago whether the force
> > argument is needed and he said it is. So I kept the arguments of
> > get_user_pages() intact and just simplified the locking...
>
> The PSM side of the code is a more traditional use of GUP (like direct
> I/O), so I think it is a different use case than the locking for IB
> memory regions.
Ah, I see. Whatever suits you best. I don't really care as long as
get_user_pages() locking doesn't leak into IB drivers :)
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists