[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524C5FD2.5050406@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:02:58 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Jingchang Lu <b35083@...escale.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] 64-bit friendly generic sched_clock()
On 10/02/2013 10:47 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:59:44AM +0100, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 04:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> This patchset adds support for 64 bit counters in the generic
>>> sched_clock code and converts drivers over to use it. Based
>>> on v3.11-rc1.
>>>
>>> Changes since v3:
>>> * Move to use seqcount to fix issues with 64-bit cyc counters
>>> * Move to hrtimer to fix underflow/overflow errors in wraparound
>>> calculation
>>> * Use of 1 hour in clocks_calc_mult_shift
>>> * Converted over drivers in drivers/clocksource
>> I've not been able to take a deep review yet, but this looks pretty much
>> like what we discussed last week, so I'm happy with it so far. Has this
>> gotten much testing (on both 32 and 64bit systems?)
>>
>> One detail: Most of this is likely to go in via tip/timers/core, but the
>> 5/17 "arch_timer: Move to generic sched_clock" will need some
>> synchronization with Catalin to make sure its ok to go in via tip. Not
>> sure what other arm64 changes are pending that would depend or collide
>> with that change.
> I wouldn't expect anything more than a trivial Kconfig clash with the arm64
> tree, if that.
So I also have a branch with these changes based on a branch with only
the prereqs that are already merged, so I can provide a pull request
that can go in via the aarch64 tree and won't collide with tip. Would
that be preferrable?
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists