linux-kernel - Re: applesmc oops in 3.10/3.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:33:00 -0600
From:	Chris Murphy <bugzilla@...orremedies.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>, khali@...ux-fr.org,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: applesmc oops in 3.10/3.11


On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:24:10PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:47:18AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:34:18PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>>>>>> One thing I have seen in all logs is the earlier "send_byte fail" message, so
>>>>>>> I think that is a pre-requisite.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not necessarily - it could be that the patch actually fixes the root
>>>>>> cause. One possible scenario is that on recent SMCs, some of the
>>>>>> commands produce more data than we actually read. This would
>>>>>> eventually lead to both data corruption and overflow somwhere in the
>>>>>> SMC internals.  If the original SMC error is interpreted as a read
>>>>>> buffer overflow, then that problem should be fixed with this patch.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Good point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But shouldn't we at least get the "flushed %d bytes" warning message in this case ?
>>>> 
>>>> The explanation I have there is that the (newer) SMC needs the
>>>> application to read the 'no more bytes' or it will get confused. It
>>>> makes sense, if the number of bytes to read is no longer specified.
>>>> 
>>> You mean that just reading from APPLESMC_CMD_PORT would solve the problem ?
>>> That might make sense.
>> 
>> It also points at the possibility of a smaller patch to test, but I
>> have not had the time to check this very deeply myself:
>> 
> I like this patch much more than the previous patch. Chris, can you test it ?

Yes. Building now. What kernel message should I be looking for? At least on 2011 and 2012 laptops I have yet to see an Oops related to smc. The kernel with previous patch at least is not causing problems on them so far, which works well as I can test more on the 2008 model.

Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/