[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131003165130.GA11974@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:51:30 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Qualcomm's PRNG
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:52:33PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> This patch set adds hardware RNG driver wich is used to control the
> Qualcomm's PRNG hardware block.
> The first patch document the DT bindings needed to sucessfuly probe
> the driver and the second patch adds the driver.
Is this really a PRNG (pseudo-random number generator)? What are the
guarantees which Qualcomm is providing for the PRNG? If it's really a
PRNG such as AES(i++, NSA_KEY), then kudo to Qualcomm for being
honest.
If it is supposed to be (or at least claimed to be) a secure random
number generator ala RDRAND suitable for use in cryptographic
applications, calling it a PRNG is going to be a bit misleading.
Cheers,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists