linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf: Fix failing assertions in perf bench numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1380821325-4017-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu,  3 Oct 2013 19:28:45 +0200
From:	Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>,
	Petr Benas <pbenas@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix failing assertions in perf bench numa

Patch adds more subtle handling of -C and -N parameters in
parse_{cpu,node}_setup_list() functions when there isn't enough NUMA nodes or
CPUs present.
Instead of assertion and terminating benchmark, partial test is skipped
with error message and perf will continue to the next one.

Fixed problem can be easily reproduced on machine with only one NUMA node:

 # Running numa/mem benchmark...

  # Running main, "perf bench numa mem -a"

...

 # Running RAM-bw-remote, "perf bench numa mem -p 1 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0 -M 1 -s
perf: bench/numa.c:622: parse_setup_node_list: Assertion `!(bind_node_0 < 0 ||
		bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes)' failed.
Aborted

Signed-off-by: Petr Benas <pbenas@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 30d1c32..64fa01c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -429,14 +429,14 @@ static int parse_cpu_list(const char *arg)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void parse_setup_cpu_list(void)
+static int parse_setup_cpu_list(void)
 {
 	struct thread_data *td;
 	char *str0, *str;
 	int t;
 
 	if (!g->p.cpu_list_str)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	dprintf("g->p.nr_tasks: %d\n", g->p.nr_tasks);
 
@@ -500,8 +500,12 @@ static void parse_setup_cpu_list(void)
 
 		dprintf("CPUs: %d_%d-%d#%dx%d\n", bind_cpu_0, bind_len, bind_cpu_1, step, mul);
 
-		BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 < 0 || bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus);
-		BUG_ON(bind_cpu_1 < 0 || bind_cpu_1 >= g->p.nr_cpus);
+		if (bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus || bind_cpu_1 >= g->p.nr_cpus) {
+			printf("\nTest not applicable, system has only %d CPUs.\n", g->p.nr_cpus);
+			return -1;
+		}
+
+		BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 < 0 || bind_cpu_1 < 0);
 		BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 > bind_cpu_1);
 
 		for (bind_cpu = bind_cpu_0; bind_cpu <= bind_cpu_1; bind_cpu += step) {
@@ -541,6 +545,7 @@ out:
 		printf("# NOTE: %d tasks bound, %d tasks unbound\n", t, g->p.nr_tasks - t);
 
 	free(str0);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int parse_cpus_opt(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused,
@@ -561,14 +566,14 @@ static int parse_node_list(const char *arg)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void parse_setup_node_list(void)
+static int parse_setup_node_list(void)
 {
 	struct thread_data *td;
 	char *str0, *str;
 	int t;
 
 	if (!g->p.node_list_str)
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	dprintf("g->p.nr_tasks: %d\n", g->p.nr_tasks);
 
@@ -619,8 +624,12 @@ static void parse_setup_node_list(void)
 
 		dprintf("NODEs: %d-%d #%d\n", bind_node_0, bind_node_1, step);
 
-		BUG_ON(bind_node_0 < 0 || bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes);
-		BUG_ON(bind_node_1 < 0 || bind_node_1 >= g->p.nr_nodes);
+		if (bind_node_0 >= g->p.nr_nodes || bind_node_1 >= g->p.nr_nodes) {
+			printf("\nTest not applicable, system has only %d nodes.\n", g->p.nr_nodes);
+			return -1;
+		}
+
+		BUG_ON(bind_node_0 < 0 || bind_node_1 < 0);
 		BUG_ON(bind_node_0 > bind_node_1);
 
 		for (bind_node = bind_node_0; bind_node <= bind_node_1; bind_node += step) {
@@ -651,6 +660,7 @@ out:
 		printf("# NOTE: %d tasks mem-bound, %d tasks unbound\n", t, g->p.nr_tasks - t);
 
 	free(str0);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int parse_nodes_opt(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused,
@@ -1356,8 +1366,8 @@ static int init(void)
 	init_thread_data();
 
 	tprintf("#\n");
-	parse_setup_cpu_list();
-	parse_setup_node_list();
+	if (parse_setup_cpu_list() || parse_setup_node_list())
+		return -1;
 	tprintf("#\n");
 
 	print_summary();
@@ -1600,7 +1610,6 @@ static int run_bench_numa(const char *name, const char **argv)
 	return 0;
 
 err:
-	usage_with_options(numa_usage, options);
 	return -1;
 }
 
@@ -1701,8 +1710,7 @@ static int bench_all(void)
 	BUG_ON(ret < 0);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
-		if (run_bench_numa(tests[i][0], tests[i] + 1))
-			return -1;
+		run_bench_numa(tests[i][0], tests[i] + 1);
 	}
 
 	printf("\n");
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/