[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131006181013.GE8252@kernel.dk>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 12:10:13 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues from irq
context
On Sun, Oct 06 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The only caller of blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues is in irq context,
> leading to lockdep splat when it actually gets called. Fix this by
> deferring the hw queue run to workqueue context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 2b85029..923e9e1 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -686,7 +686,8 @@ void blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q)
> if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state))
> continue;
>
> - blk_mq_start_hw_queue(hctx);
> + clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state);
> + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues);
Thanks, applied. Might not be a bad idea to just mimic the run queue
API, and provide a blk_mq_start_hw_queue(hctx, is_async) instead.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists