linux-kernel - Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131006084200.302560@gmx.com>
Date:	Sun, 06 Oct 2013 10:42:00 +0200
From:	"Tibor Billes" <tbilles@....com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels

From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 10/01/13 10:27 PM
> To: Tibor Billes
> Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels
> 
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 03:59:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 09/13/13 02:19 AM
> > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 09/09/13 10:44 PM
> 
> [ . . . ]
> 
> > > > Sure. The attached tar file contains traces of good kernels. The first is with
> > > > version 3.9.7 (no patch applied) which was the last stable kernel I tried and
> > > > didn't have this issue. The second is version 3.11 with your fix applied.
> > > > Judging by the size of the traces, 3.11.0+ is still doing more work than
> > > > 3.9.7.
> > > 
> > > Indeed, though quite a bit less than the problematic traces.
> > > 
> > > Did you have all three patches applied to 3.11.0, or just the last one?
> > > If the latter, could you please try it with all three?
> > 
> > Only the last one was applied to 3.11.0. The attachement now contains the
> > RCU trace with all thee applied. It seems to be smaller in size, but still
> > not close to 3.9.7.
> > 
> > > > > > I'm not sure about LKML policies about attaching not-so-small files to
> > > > > > emails, so I've dropped LKML from the CC list. Please CC the mailing
> > > > > > list in your reply.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Done!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Another approach is to post the traces on the web and send the URL to
> > > > > LKML. But whatever works for you is fine by me.
> > > > 
> > > > Sending directly to you won again :) Could you please CC the list in your
> > > > reply?
> > > 
> > > Done! ;-)
> > 
> > Could you please CC the list in your reply again? :)
> 
> This trace is quite strange -- there are a number of processes that sleep
> and then wake up almost immediately, as in within a microsecond or so.
> I don't know why they would be doing that, and I also cannot think of
> what RCU might be doing to make them do that.
> 
> I am unfortunately out of ideas on this one.

Okay. Thank you for all your help! :)

Tibor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/