[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131007005355.GA22211@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 01:53:55 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: update win8 OSI blacklist
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:50:18PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> > I don't get the final
> > say in whether or not this patch gets merged, but there's a decent
> > chance that I'm going to be the one who has to remove the entries again
> > once the backlight mess is fixed up. My life would be significantly
> > easier if the entries are unambiguously identified in such a way that I
> > can remove them without having to dig through git history to figure out
> > where each came from.
>
> And a *single* comment on top of this group entries achieves that just
> fine. You haven't provided a single argument as to why that wouldn't
> be the case.
No, it demonstrably doesn't. The comments that do exist refer to only a
subset of the entries underneath them. Having a per-entry comment is
significantly clearer. Given that I have to delete things from this file
and you don't, I have absolutely no idea why you refuse to believe me on
this.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists