linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi: update win8 OSI blacklist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMP44s1knbxW5C_tRSqopRLd+b2fXfuH=E3_L4EdOAUG4RMVhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:50:18 -0500
From:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: update win8 OSI blacklist

On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:27:48PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> If _you_ want to add comments for each entry in the list you can do so
>> after this patch is applied.
>
> If you want to participate in a collaborative development effort you
> should pay attention to other people's concerns.

I did that when I listened to your comment, and I argued against it.

Disagreeing is not the same as not paying attention.

> I don't get the final
> say in whether or not this patch gets merged, but there's a decent
> chance that I'm going to be the one who has to remove the entries again
> once the backlight mess is fixed up. My life would be significantly
> easier if the entries are unambiguously identified in such a way that I
> can remove them without having to dig through git history to figure out
> where each came from.

And a *single* comment on top of this group entries achieves that just
fine. You haven't provided a single argument as to why that wouldn't
be the case.

In fact, you are the one that is not paying attention.

> Is that really an unreasonable request?

That wasn't a request, that was an explanation of what would make your
life easier.

And if uncommented entries is a problem for you, you already have that
problem, because the entries to remove are already there, uncommented.
The original patch I sent had a comment, so that's not my fault.

This patch would not make your life any harder, so that is a red
herring. The problem is already there.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/