[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131007173531.GX8949@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:35:31 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Prakash Manjunathappa <prakash.pm@...com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC
specific features
Hi Linus W,
Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series?
These are badly needed to not break omap3 PM support when
we're moving to device tree based booting.
* Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [131002 22:50]:
> Let's replace is_pinconf with flags and add struct pcs_soc_data
> so we can support SoC specific features like pin wake-up events.
>
> Done in collaboration with Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>.
>
> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> Cc: Prakash Manjunathappa <prakash.pm@...com>
> Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> index a82ace4..f88d3d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> @@ -150,19 +150,27 @@ struct pcs_name {
> };
>
> /**
> + * struct pcs_soc_data - SoC specific settings
> + * @flags: initial SoC specific PCS_FEAT_xxx values
> + */
> +struct pcs_soc_data {
> + unsigned flags;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> * struct pcs_device - pinctrl device instance
> * @res: resources
> * @base: virtual address of the controller
> * @size: size of the ioremapped area
> * @dev: device entry
> * @pctl: pin controller device
> + * @flags: mask of PCS_FEAT_xxx values
> * @mutex: mutex protecting the lists
> * @width: bits per mux register
> * @fmask: function register mask
> * @fshift: function register shift
> * @foff: value to turn mux off
> * @fmax: max number of functions in fmask
> - * @is_pinconf: whether supports pinconf
> * @bits_per_pin:number of bits per pin
> * @names: array of register names for pins
> * @pins: physical pins on the SoC
> @@ -183,6 +191,8 @@ struct pcs_device {
> unsigned size;
> struct device *dev;
> struct pinctrl_dev *pctl;
> + unsigned flags;
> +#define PCS_FEAT_PINCONF (1 << 0)
> struct mutex mutex;
> unsigned width;
> unsigned fmask;
> @@ -190,7 +200,6 @@ struct pcs_device {
> unsigned foff;
> unsigned fmax;
> bool bits_per_mux;
> - bool is_pinconf;
> unsigned bits_per_pin;
> struct pcs_name *names;
> struct pcs_data pins;
> @@ -206,6 +215,8 @@ struct pcs_device {
> void (*write)(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg);
> };
>
> +#define PCS_HAS_PINCONF (pcs->flags & PCS_FEAT_PINCONF)
> +
> static int pcs_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin,
> unsigned long *config);
> static int pcs_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin,
> @@ -1060,7 +1071,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
> };
>
> /* If pinconf isn't supported, don't parse properties in below. */
> - if (!pcs->is_pinconf)
> + if (!PCS_HAS_PINCONF)
> return 0;
>
> /* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
> @@ -1184,7 +1195,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
> (*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
> (*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
>
> - if (pcs->is_pinconf) {
> + if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF) {
> res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
> if (res)
> goto free_pingroups;
> @@ -1305,7 +1316,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_bits_in_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
> (*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
> (*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
>
> - if (pcs->is_pinconf) {
> + if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF) {
> dev_err(pcs->dev, "pinconf not supported\n");
> goto free_pingroups;
> }
> @@ -1525,6 +1536,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> const struct of_device_id *match;
> struct resource *res;
> struct pcs_device *pcs;
> + const struct pcs_soc_data *soc;
> int ret;
>
> match = of_match_device(pcs_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> @@ -1541,7 +1553,8 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcs->pingroups);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcs->functions);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcs->gpiofuncs);
> - pcs->is_pinconf = match->data;
> + soc = match->data;
> + pcs->flags = soc->flags;
>
> PCS_GET_PROP_U32("pinctrl-single,register-width", &pcs->width,
> "register width not specified\n");
> @@ -1610,7 +1623,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pcs->desc.name = DRIVER_NAME;
> pcs->desc.pctlops = &pcs_pinctrl_ops;
> pcs->desc.pmxops = &pcs_pinmux_ops;
> - if (pcs->is_pinconf)
> + if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF)
> pcs->desc.confops = &pcs_pinconf_ops;
> pcs->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>
> @@ -1652,9 +1665,16 @@ static int pcs_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct pcs_soc_data pinctrl_single = {
> +};
> +
> +static const struct pcs_soc_data pinconf_single = {
> + .flags = PCS_FEAT_PINCONF,
> +};
> +
> static struct of_device_id pcs_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "pinctrl-single", .data = (void *)false },
> - { .compatible = "pinconf-single", .data = (void *)true },
> + { .compatible = "pinctrl-single", .data = &pinctrl_single },
> + { .compatible = "pinconf-single", .data = &pinconf_single },
> { },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pcs_of_match);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists