| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131007173543.GA17833@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:35:43 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, peter@...leysoftware.com
Subject: Re: tty^Wrcu/perf lockdep trace.
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 09:28:02AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 06:05:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:25:06PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Why
> > > > do we still have a per-cpu kthread in nocb mode? The idea is that we do
> > > > not disturb the cpu, right? So I suppose these kthreads get to run on
> > > > another cpu.
> > >
> > > Yep, the idea is that usermode figures out where to run them. Even if
> > > usermode doesn't do that, this has the effect of getting them to be
> > > more out of the way of real-time tasks.
> > >
> > > > Since its running on another cpu; we get into atomic and memory barriers
> > > > anyway; so why not keep the logic the same as no-nocb but have another
> > > > cpu check our nocb cpu's state.
> > >
> > > You can do that today by setting rcu_nocb_poll, but that results in
> > > frequent polling wakeups even when the system is completely idle, which
> > > is out of the question for the battery-powered embedded guys.
> >
> > So its this polling I don't get.. why is the different behaviour
> > required? And why would you continue polling if the cpus were actually
> > idle.
>
> The idea is to offload the overhead of doing the wakeup from (say)
> a real-time thread/CPU onto some housekeeping CPU.
>
> > Is there some confusion between the nr_running==1 extended quiescent
> > state and the nr_running==0 extended quiescent state?
>
> This is independent of the nr_running=1 extended quiescent state. The
> wakeups only happen when runnning in the kernel. That said, a real-time
> thread might want both rcu_nocb_poll=y and CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y.
>
> > Now, none of this solves the issue at hand because event the 'regular'
> > no-nocb rcu mode has this issue of needing to wake kthreads, but I'd
> > like to get a better understanding of why nocb mode is as it is.
> >
> >
> > I've seen you've since send a few more emails; I might find some of the
> > answers in there. Let me go read the :-)
>
> I -think- I have solved it, but much testing and review will of course
> be required. And fixing last night's test failures...
For which the patch turned out to be an innocent bystander. Apparently,
some of the more creative possible settings of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF cause RCU some heartburn. Looking into it.
(Yes, I am finally refactoring my RCU tests.)
Here is the patch which fixes the bug that Peter found.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rcu: Break call_rcu() deadlock involving scheduler and perf
Dave Jones got the following lockdep splat:
> ======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 3.12.0-rc3+ #92 Not tainted
> -------------------------------------------------------
> trinity-child2/15191 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&rdp->nocb_wq){......}, at: [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81154c19>] perf_event_exit_task+0x109/0x230
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #3 (&ctx->lock){-.-...}:
> [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
> [<ffffffff81733f90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
> [<ffffffff811500ff>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x2df/0x5e0
> [<ffffffff81091b83>] perf_event_task_sched_out+0x93/0xa0
> [<ffffffff81732052>] __schedule+0x1d2/0xa20
> [<ffffffff81732f30>] preempt_schedule_irq+0x50/0xb0
> [<ffffffff817352b6>] retint_kernel+0x26/0x30
> [<ffffffff813eed04>] tty_flip_buffer_push+0x34/0x50
> [<ffffffff813f0504>] pty_write+0x54/0x60
> [<ffffffff813e900d>] n_tty_write+0x32d/0x4e0
> [<ffffffff813e5838>] tty_write+0x158/0x2d0
> [<ffffffff811c4850>] vfs_write+0xc0/0x1f0
> [<ffffffff811c52cc>] SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
>
> -> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
> [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
> [<ffffffff81733f90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
> [<ffffffff810980b2>] wake_up_new_task+0xc2/0x2e0
> [<ffffffff81054336>] do_fork+0x126/0x460
> [<ffffffff81054696>] kernel_thread+0x26/0x30
> [<ffffffff8171ff93>] rest_init+0x23/0x140
> [<ffffffff81ee1e4b>] start_kernel+0x3f6/0x403
> [<ffffffff81ee1571>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
> [<ffffffff81ee1664>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf1/0xf4
>
> -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
> [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
> [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
> [<ffffffff810979d1>] try_to_wake_up+0x31/0x350
> [<ffffffff81097d62>] default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
> [<ffffffff81084af8>] autoremove_wake_function+0x18/0x40
> [<ffffffff8108ea38>] __wake_up_common+0x58/0x90
> [<ffffffff8108ff59>] __wake_up+0x39/0x50
> [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
> [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
> [<ffffffff81111b8d>] call_rcu+0x1d/0x20
> [<ffffffff81093697>] cpu_attach_domain+0x287/0x360
> [<ffffffff81099d7e>] build_sched_domains+0xe5e/0x10a0
> [<ffffffff81efa7fc>] sched_init_smp+0x3b7/0x47a
> [<ffffffff81ee1f4e>] kernel_init_freeable+0xf6/0x202
> [<ffffffff817200be>] kernel_init+0xe/0x190
> [<ffffffff8173d22c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>
> -> #0 (&rdp->nocb_wq){......}:
> [<ffffffff810cb7ca>] __lock_acquire+0x191a/0x1be0
> [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
> [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
> [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
> [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
> [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
> [<ffffffff81111bb0>] kfree_call_rcu+0x20/0x30
> [<ffffffff81149abf>] put_ctx+0x4f/0x70
> [<ffffffff81154c3e>] perf_event_exit_task+0x12e/0x230
> [<ffffffff81056b8d>] do_exit+0x30d/0xcc0
> [<ffffffff8105893c>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xc0
> [<ffffffff810589c4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
> [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
> &rdp->nocb_wq --> &rq->lock --> &ctx->lock
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&ctx->lock);
> lock(&rq->lock);
> lock(&ctx->lock);
> lock(&rdp->nocb_wq);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 1 lock held by trinity-child2/15191:
> #0: (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81154c19>] perf_event_exit_task+0x109/0x230
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 2 PID: 15191 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc3+ #92
> ffffffff82565b70 ffff880070c2dbf8 ffffffff8172a363 ffffffff824edf40
> ffff880070c2dc38 ffffffff81726741 ffff880070c2dc90 ffff88022383b1c0
> ffff88022383aac0 0000000000000000 ffff88022383b188 ffff88022383b1c0
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8172a363>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
> [<ffffffff81726741>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20f
> [<ffffffff810cb7ca>] __lock_acquire+0x191a/0x1be0
> [<ffffffff810c6439>] ? get_lock_stats+0x19/0x60
> [<ffffffff8100b2f4>] ? native_sched_clock+0x24/0x80
> [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
> [<ffffffff8108ff43>] ? __wake_up+0x23/0x50
> [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
> [<ffffffff8108ff43>] ? __wake_up+0x23/0x50
> [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
> [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
> [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
> [<ffffffff8109bc8f>] ? local_clock+0x3f/0x50
> [<ffffffff81111bb0>] kfree_call_rcu+0x20/0x30
> [<ffffffff81149abf>] put_ctx+0x4f/0x70
> [<ffffffff81154c3e>] perf_event_exit_task+0x12e/0x230
> [<ffffffff81056b8d>] do_exit+0x30d/0xcc0
> [<ffffffff810c9af5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x115/0x1e0
> [<ffffffff810c9bcd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [<ffffffff8105893c>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xc0
> [<ffffffff810589c4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
> [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
The underlying problem is that perf is invoking call_rcu() with the
scheduler locks held, but in NOCB mode, call_rcu() will with high
probability invoke the scheduler -- which just might want to use its
locks. The reason that call_rcu() needs to invoke the scheduler is
to wake up the corresponding rcuo callback-offload kthread, which
does the job of starting up a grace period and invoking the callbacks
afterwards.
One solution (championed on a related problem by Lai Jiangshan) is to
simply defer the wakeup to some point where scheduler locks are no longer
held. Since we don't want to unnecessarily incur the cost of such
deferral, the task before us is threefold:
1. Determine when it is likely that a relevant scheduler lock is held.
2. Defer the wakeup in such cases.
3. Ensure that all deferred wakeups eventually happen, preferably
sooner rather than later.
We use irqs_disabled_flags() as a proxy for relevant scheduler locks
being held. This works because the relevant locks are always acquired
with interrupts disabled. We may defer more often than needed, but that
is at least safe.
The wakeup deferral is tracked via a new field in the per-CPU and
per-RCU-flavor rcu_data structure, namely ->nocb_defer_wakeup.
This flag is checked by the RCU core processing. The __rcu_pending()
function now checks this flag, which causes rcu_check_callbacks()
to initiate RCU core processing at each scheduling-clock interrupt
where this flag is set. Of course this is not sufficient because
scheduling-clock interrupts are often turned off (the things we used to
be able to count on!). So the flags are also checked on entry to any
state that RCU considers to be idle, which includes both NO_HZ_IDLE idle
state and NO_HZ_FULL user-mode-execution state.
This approach should allow call_rcu() to be invoked regardless of what
locks you might be holding, the key word being "should".
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
index f3778f8952da..b8c3c813ea57 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
@@ -396,14 +396,14 @@ o Each element of the form "3/3 ..>. 0:7 ^0" represents one rcu_node
The output of "cat rcu/rcu_sched/rcu_pending" looks as follows:
- 0!np=26111 qsp=29 rpq=5386 cbr=1 cng=570 gpc=3674 gps=577 nn=15903
- 1!np=28913 qsp=35 rpq=6097 cbr=1 cng=448 gpc=3700 gps=554 nn=18113
- 2!np=32740 qsp=37 rpq=6202 cbr=0 cng=476 gpc=4627 gps=546 nn=20889
- 3 np=23679 qsp=22 rpq=5044 cbr=1 cng=415 gpc=3403 gps=347 nn=14469
- 4!np=30714 qsp=4 rpq=5574 cbr=0 cng=528 gpc=3931 gps=639 nn=20042
- 5 np=28910 qsp=2 rpq=5246 cbr=0 cng=428 gpc=4105 gps=709 nn=18422
- 6!np=38648 qsp=5 rpq=7076 cbr=0 cng=840 gpc=4072 gps=961 nn=25699
- 7 np=37275 qsp=2 rpq=6873 cbr=0 cng=868 gpc=3416 gps=971 nn=25147
+ 0!np=26111 qsp=29 rpq=5386 cbr=1 cng=570 gpc=3674 gps=577 nn=15903 ndw=0
+ 1!np=28913 qsp=35 rpq=6097 cbr=1 cng=448 gpc=3700 gps=554 nn=18113 ndw=0
+ 2!np=32740 qsp=37 rpq=6202 cbr=0 cng=476 gpc=4627 gps=546 nn=20889 ndw=0
+ 3 np=23679 qsp=22 rpq=5044 cbr=1 cng=415 gpc=3403 gps=347 nn=14469 ndw=0
+ 4!np=30714 qsp=4 rpq=5574 cbr=0 cng=528 gpc=3931 gps=639 nn=20042 ndw=0
+ 5 np=28910 qsp=2 rpq=5246 cbr=0 cng=428 gpc=4105 gps=709 nn=18422 ndw=0
+ 6!np=38648 qsp=5 rpq=7076 cbr=0 cng=840 gpc=4072 gps=961 nn=25699 ndw=0
+ 7 np=37275 qsp=2 rpq=6873 cbr=0 cng=868 gpc=3416 gps=971 nn=25147 ndw=0
The fields are as follows:
@@ -432,6 +432,10 @@ o "gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had
o "gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started,
but this CPU was not yet aware of it.
+o "ndw" is the number of times that a wakeup of an rcuo
+ callback-offload kthread had to be deferred in order to avoid
+ deadlock.
+
o "nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing.
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index a33a24d10611..106f7f5cdd1d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp)
static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
bool user)
{
+ struct rcu_state *rsp;
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+
trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("Start"), oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
if (!user && !is_idle_task(current)) {
struct task_struct *idle __maybe_unused =
@@ -373,6 +376,10 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
current->pid, current->comm,
idle->pid, idle->comm); /* must be idle task! */
}
+ for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
+ rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
+ do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(rdp);
+ }
rcu_prepare_for_idle(smp_processor_id());
/* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see prior RCU read-side crit sects */
smp_mb__before_atomic_inc(); /* See above. */
@@ -1908,13 +1915,13 @@ rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp,
* Adopt the RCU callbacks from the specified rcu_state structure's
* orphanage. The caller must hold the ->orphan_lock.
*/
-static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
{
int i;
struct rcu_data *rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
/* No-CBs CPUs are handled specially. */
- if (rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp, rdp))
+ if (rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp, rdp, flags))
return;
/* Do the accounting first. */
@@ -1993,7 +2000,7 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
/* Orphan the dead CPU's callbacks, and adopt them if appropriate. */
rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(cpu, rsp, rnp, rdp);
- rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp);
+ rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp, flags);
/* Remove the outgoing CPU from the masks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */
mask = rdp->grpmask; /* rnp->grplo is constant. */
@@ -2310,6 +2317,9 @@ __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp)
/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
if (cpu_has_callbacks_ready_to_invoke(rdp))
invoke_rcu_callbacks(rsp, rdp);
+
+ /* Do any needed deferred wakeups of rcuo kthreads. */
+ do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(rdp);
}
/*
@@ -2444,7 +2454,7 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
if (cpu != -1)
rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
- offline = !__call_rcu_nocb(rdp, head, lazy);
+ offline = !__call_rcu_nocb(rdp, head, lazy, flags);
WARN_ON_ONCE(offline);
/* _call_rcu() is illegal on offline CPU; leak the callback. */
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -2797,6 +2807,12 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
return 1;
}
+ /* Does this CPU need a deferred NOCB wakeup? */
+ if (rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(rdp)) {
+ rdp->n_rp_nocb_defer_wakeup++;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
/* nothing to do */
rdp->n_rp_need_nothing++;
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 8e34d8674a4e..a87adfc2916b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
unsigned long n_rp_cpu_needs_gp;
unsigned long n_rp_gp_completed;
unsigned long n_rp_gp_started;
+ unsigned long n_rp_nocb_defer_wakeup;
unsigned long n_rp_need_nothing;
/* 6) _rcu_barrier() and OOM callbacks. */
@@ -335,6 +336,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
int nocb_p_count_lazy; /* (approximate). */
wait_queue_head_t nocb_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
struct task_struct *nocb_kthread;
+ bool nocb_defer_wakeup; /* Defer wakeup of nocb_kthread. */
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
/* 8) RCU CPU stall data. */
@@ -550,9 +552,12 @@ static void rcu_nocb_gp_set(struct rcu_node *rnp, int nrq);
static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp);
static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp);
static bool __call_rcu_nocb(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
- bool lazy);
+ bool lazy, unsigned long flags);
static bool rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp,
- struct rcu_data *rdp);
+ struct rcu_data *rdp,
+ unsigned long flags);
+static bool rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp);
+static void do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp);
static void rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 747df70a4d64..fe4caadae1b6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -2104,7 +2104,8 @@ bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
static void __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue(struct rcu_data *rdp,
struct rcu_head *rhp,
struct rcu_head **rhtp,
- int rhcount, int rhcount_lazy)
+ int rhcount, int rhcount_lazy,
+ unsigned long flags)
{
int len;
struct rcu_head **old_rhpp;
@@ -2125,9 +2126,16 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue(struct rcu_data *rdp,
}
len = atomic_long_read(&rdp->nocb_q_count);
if (old_rhpp == &rdp->nocb_head) {
- wake_up(&rdp->nocb_wq); /* ... only if queue was empty ... */
+ if (!irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {
+ wake_up(&rdp->nocb_wq); /* ... if queue was empty ... */
+ trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->cpu,
+ TPS("WakeEmpty"));
+ } else {
+ rdp->nocb_defer_wakeup = true;
+ trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->cpu,
+ TPS("WakeEmptyIsDeferred"));
+ }
rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = 0;
- trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->cpu, TPS("WakeEmpty"));
} else if (len > rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark) {
wake_up_process(t); /* ... or if many callbacks queued. */
rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = LONG_MAX / 2;
@@ -2148,12 +2156,12 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue(struct rcu_data *rdp,
* "rcuo" kthread can find it.
*/
static bool __call_rcu_nocb(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
- bool lazy)
+ bool lazy, unsigned long flags)
{
if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(rdp->cpu))
return 0;
- __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue(rdp, rhp, &rhp->next, 1, lazy);
+ __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue(rdp, rhp, &rhp->next, 1, lazy, flags);
if (__is_kfree_rcu_offset((unsigned long)rhp->func))
trace_rcu_kfree_callback(rdp->rsp->name, rhp,
(unsigned long)rhp->func,
@@ -2171,7 +2179,8 @@ static bool __call_rcu_nocb(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
* not a no-CBs CPU.
*/
static bool __maybe_unused rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp,
- struct rcu_data *rdp)
+ struct rcu_data *rdp,
+ unsigned long flags)
{
long ql = rsp->qlen;
long qll = rsp->qlen_lazy;
@@ -2185,14 +2194,14 @@ static bool __maybe_unused rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp,
/* First, enqueue the donelist, if any. This preserves CB ordering. */
if (rsp->orphan_donelist != NULL) {
__call_rcu_nocb_enqueue(rdp, rsp->orphan_donelist,
- rsp->orphan_donetail, ql, qll);
+ rsp->orphan_donetail, ql, qll, flags);
ql = qll = 0;
rsp->orphan_donelist = NULL;
rsp->orphan_donetail = &rsp->orphan_donelist;
}
if (rsp->orphan_nxtlist != NULL) {
__call_rcu_nocb_enqueue(rdp, rsp->orphan_nxtlist,
- rsp->orphan_nxttail, ql, qll);
+ rsp->orphan_nxttail, ql, qll, flags);
ql = qll = 0;
rsp->orphan_nxtlist = NULL;
rsp->orphan_nxttail = &rsp->orphan_nxtlist;
@@ -2314,6 +2323,22 @@ static int rcu_nocb_kthread(void *arg)
return 0;
}
+/* Is a deferred wakeup of rcu_nocb_kthread() required? */
+static bool rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ return ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->nocb_defer_wakeup);
+}
+
+/* Do a deferred wakeup of rcu_nocb_kthread(). */
+static void do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ if (!rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(rdp))
+ return;
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->nocb_defer_wakeup) = false;
+ wake_up(&rdp->nocb_wq);
+ trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->cpu, TPS("DeferredWakeEmpty"));
+}
+
/* Initialize per-rcu_data variables for no-CBs CPUs. */
static void __init rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
@@ -2369,13 +2394,14 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
}
static bool __call_rcu_nocb(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
- bool lazy)
+ bool lazy, unsigned long flags)
{
return 0;
}
static bool __maybe_unused rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp,
- struct rcu_data *rdp)
+ struct rcu_data *rdp,
+ unsigned long flags)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -2384,6 +2410,15 @@ static void __init rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
}
+static bool rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+static void do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+}
+
static void __init rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
index cf6c17412932..77a6831b9c51 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
@@ -364,9 +364,10 @@ static void print_one_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
rdp->n_rp_report_qs,
rdp->n_rp_cb_ready,
rdp->n_rp_cpu_needs_gp);
- seq_printf(m, "gpc=%ld gps=%ld nn=%ld\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "gpc=%ld gps=%ld nn=%ld ndw%ld\n",
rdp->n_rp_gp_completed,
rdp->n_rp_gp_started,
+ rdp->n_rp_nocb_defer_wakeup,
rdp->n_rp_need_nothing);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists