linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131008125013.85dcccf418260d43b6cb120a@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:50:13 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes

On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:00:19 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi! Here is a couple of fixes for soft dirty pages tracking.
> While first two patches are adressing issues, the last one
> is rather a cleanup which I've been asked to implement long
> ago, but I'm not sure if anyone picked it up.
> 

Do you consider the problems which patches 1 and 2 address to be
sufficiently serious to justify backporting into -stable?

I already have patch 3, as
arch-x86-mnify-pte_to_pgoff-and-pgoff_to_pte-helpers.patch (with
s/m/u).  I've queued it for transmission to the x86 guys.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/