| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131008195100.GA21046@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:51:01 -0300
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
"Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/9] MCS Lock: Restructure the MCS lock defines and
locking code into its own file
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 03:38:32PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> We will need the MCS lock code for doing optimistic spinning for rwsem.
> Extracting the MCS code from mutex.c and put into its own file allow us
> to reuse this code easily for rwsem.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
> ---
> include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mutex.h | 5 ++-
> kernel/mutex.c | 60 ++++----------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b5de3b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +/*
> + * MCS lock defines
> + *
> + * This file contains the main data structure and API definitions of MCS lock.
> + *
> + * The MCS lock (proposed by Mellor-Crummey and Scott) is a simple spin-lock
> + * with the desirable properties of being fair, and with each cpu trying
> + * to acquire the lock spinning on a local variable.
> + * It avoids expensive cache bouncings that common test-and-set spin-lock
> + * implementations incur.
> + */
nitpick:
I believe you need
+#include <asm/processor.h>
here, to avoid breaking the build when arch_mutex_cpu_relax() is not defined
(arch/s390 is one case)
> +#ifndef __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> +#define __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> +
> +struct mcs_spinlock {
> + struct mcs_spinlock *next;
> + int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
> + * time spent in this lock function.
> + */
> +static noinline
> +void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> +{
> + struct mcs_spinlock *prev;
> +
> + /* Init node */
> + node->locked = 0;
> + node->next = NULL;
> +
> + prev = xchg(lock, node);
> + if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
> + /* Lock acquired */
> + node->locked = 1;
> + return;
> + }
> + ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
> + smp_wmb();
> + /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */
> + while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked))
> + arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> +}
> +
> +static void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> +{
> + struct mcs_spinlock *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next);
> +
> + if (likely(!next)) {
> + /*
> + * Release the lock by setting it to NULL
> + */
> + if (cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node)
> + return;
> + /* Wait until the next pointer is set */
> + while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
> + arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> + }
> + ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
> + smp_wmb();
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
> index ccd4260..e6eaeea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mutex.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> * - detects multi-task circular deadlocks and prints out all affected
> * locks and tasks (and only those tasks)
> */
> +struct mcs_spinlock;
> struct mutex {
> /* 1: unlocked, 0: locked, negative: locked, possible waiters */
> atomic_t count;
> @@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ struct mutex {
> struct task_struct *owner;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> - void *spin_mlock; /* Spinner MCS lock */
> + struct mcs_spinlock *mcs_lock; /* Spinner MCS lock */
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
> const char *name;
> @@ -179,4 +180,4 @@ extern int atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(atomic_t *cnt, struct mutex *lock);
> #define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
> #endif
>
> -#endif
> +#endif /* __LINUX_MUTEX_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
> index 6d647ae..4640731 100644
> --- a/kernel/mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/mutex.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
> +#include <linux/mcs_spinlock.h>
>
> /*
> * In the DEBUG case we are using the "NULL fastpath" for mutexes,
> @@ -52,7 +53,7 @@ __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list);
> mutex_clear_owner(lock);
> #ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> - lock->spin_mlock = NULL;
> + lock->mcs_lock = NULL;
> #endif
>
> debug_mutex_init(lock, name, key);
> @@ -111,54 +112,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock);
> * more or less simultaneously, the spinners need to acquire a MCS lock
> * first before spinning on the owner field.
> *
> - * We don't inline mspin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
> - * time spent in this lock function.
> */
> -struct mspin_node {
> - struct mspin_node *next ;
> - int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */
> -};
> -#define MLOCK(mutex) ((struct mspin_node **)&((mutex)->spin_mlock))
> -
> -static noinline
> -void mspin_lock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node)
> -{
> - struct mspin_node *prev;
> -
> - /* Init node */
> - node->locked = 0;
> - node->next = NULL;
> -
> - prev = xchg(lock, node);
> - if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
> - /* Lock acquired */
> - node->locked = 1;
> - return;
> - }
> - ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
> - smp_wmb();
> - /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */
> - while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked))
> - arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> -}
> -
> -static void mspin_unlock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node)
> -{
> - struct mspin_node *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next);
> -
> - if (likely(!next)) {
> - /*
> - * Release the lock by setting it to NULL
> - */
> - if (cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node)
> - return;
> - /* Wait until the next pointer is set */
> - while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
> - arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> - }
> - ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
> - smp_wmb();
> -}
>
> /*
> * Mutex spinning code migrated from kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -448,7 +402,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
>
> for (;;) {
> struct task_struct *owner;
> - struct mspin_node node;
> + struct mcs_spinlock node;
>
> if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL) && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
> struct ww_mutex *ww;
> @@ -470,10 +424,10 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
> * If there's an owner, wait for it to either
> * release the lock or go to sleep.
> */
> - mspin_lock(MLOCK(lock), &node);
> + mcs_spin_lock(&lock->mcs_lock, &node);
> owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner);
> if (owner && !mutex_spin_on_owner(lock, owner)) {
> - mspin_unlock(MLOCK(lock), &node);
> + mcs_spin_unlock(&lock->mcs_lock, &node);
> goto slowpath;
> }
>
> @@ -488,11 +442,11 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
> }
>
> mutex_set_owner(lock);
> - mspin_unlock(MLOCK(lock), &node);
> + mcs_spin_unlock(&lock->mcs_lock, &node);
> preempt_enable();
> return 0;
> }
> - mspin_unlock(MLOCK(lock), &node);
> + mcs_spin_unlock(&lock->mcs_lock, &node);
>
> /*
> * When there's no owner, we might have preempted between the
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists