[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131008200155.GD13848@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 22:01:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] sched/wait: Collapse __wait_event macros -v5
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> To me it would sure look nice to have kernel/rcu/tree.c,
> kernel/rcu/tiny.c, kernel/rcu/core.c, etc.
>
> [ ... and we would certainly also break new ground by introducing a
> "torture.c" file, for the first time in Linux kernel history! ;-) ]
>
> But it's really your call, this is something you should only do if you are
> comfortable with it.
IFF we're going to restructure rcu; can we save the CPP some work and do
away with rcu*_plugin.h ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists