linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add check for sscanf without return use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAErSpo75uQL5woms175LR4KCAmqT_SWpQcXGdbKccgVPdh6xhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Oct 2013 18:10:53 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add check for sscanf without return use

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:56 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:45:23 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Naked use sscanf can be troublesome.
>>
>> It would be helpful to expand on "troublesome"?
>
> Dunno, you either know or the couple of paragraphs
> it takes to explain with examples won't really be
> too helpful in a commit log.

It would be helpful to me, since I don't write code with sscanf every
day.  A URL to an LKML description or something would be enough if the
commit log size is the concern.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/