[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131008221417.GF25034@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:14:17 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [xen] double fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:17:42PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> I find the above debug messages very helpful in locating the buggy
> driver. How about enabling it whenever CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE is
> enabled? Something like
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
> - pr_debug("kobject: '%s' (%p): %s, parent %p (delayed)\n",
> + printk(KERN_INFO "kobject: '%s' (%p): %s, parent %p (delayed)\n",
> kobject_name(kobj), kobj, __func__, kobj->parent);
>
> pr_debug() won't be displayed by default, and it depends on
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG.
Please consider using pr_info() instead of printk(KERN_INFO - it's
slightly less typing.
I can see that being a useful change while we have these problematical
instances to track down, but I do wonder whether it'll make the thing
too noisy. Does anyone have other opinions on this point? Linus?
Greg?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists