linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:30:57 +0200
From:	Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@....com>
To:	Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>
CC:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@....com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device
 tree

On 09.10.2013 08:14, ext Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "WS" == Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> writes:
> 
> WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>>> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
>>> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
>>> module again to get it working.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@....com>
> 
> WS> Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?
> 
> Arguably yes.
> 

Yes, and it's also a one line fix. Should I do it in a separate
patch or should I change this one and resubmit?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/