[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131009124844.GA21428@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:48:44 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/63] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA
balancing V9
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:03:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > kernel/sched/fair.c:819:22: warning: 'task_h_load' declared 'static' but never defined [-Wunused-function]
>
> Not too pretty, but it avoids the warning:
>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -681,6 +681,8 @@ static u64 sched_vslice(struct cfs_rq *c
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
> +
> static inline void __update_task_entity_contrib(struct sched_entity *se);
>
> /* Give new task start runnable values to heavy its load in infant time */
> @@ -816,8 +818,6 @@ update_stats_curr_start(struct cfs_rq *c
> * Scheduling class queueing methods:
> */
>
> -static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
Hm, so we really want to do a split-up of this file once things have
calmed down - that will address such dependency issues.
Until then this fix will do, I've backmerged it to the originating patch.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists