[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131009171811.GA12623@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 19:18:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00740060
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:19:11PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > > Fengguang, I do not think this will help, but just in case. Could you
> > > > > show the result of
> > > > >
> > > > > $ kernel/task_work.s
> > >
> > > Update: I recompiled the kernel with gcc 4.4.7 and find it booting fine!
> >
> > > # 208 "/c/wfg/tip/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h" 1
> > > bts $1, 8(%eax); setc %dl #,, c
> >
> > That compiler doesn't appear to have asm goto support, so we fall back
> > to the code we already knew worked :-)
>
> I'm using 4.7.2 with randconfig testing, which has asm goto support, and
> I haven't seen this crash yet.
>
> Unless my testing is off it might be a bug in GCC 4.8, or a pre-existing
> bug gets exposed by GCC 4.8.
And as it happens, just a few hours later I hit a very similar crash, this
time compiled with both 4.7.3 and 4.7.2! (config attached)
This has a weird-x86-arch tuning knob as well:
CONFIG_MGEODE_LX=y
So I think we might need to turn off asm goto for all things 32-bit x86.
Thanks,
Ingo
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (111914 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists