[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131009181613.GW30970@tucnak.zalov.cz>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:16:13 +0200
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00740060
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:46:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:33:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:07:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Once I force a x86_64 build using the 'same' config it goes away and
> > > generates 'sensible' code again (although I don't see why L9 isn't
> > > merged with L2):
> >
> > i386-SMP also generates correct code afaict; a tad stupid but not wrong.
> >
> > If I remove ftrace from the .config its still broken..
> > If I also remove the likely/unlikely tracer its still broken and lots
> > smaller:
>
> OK, its -march=winchip2 that's buggered.
Confirmed as gcc bug, filed http://gcc.gnu.org/PR58670
Seems all of 4.[6-9] miscompile it. Will have a look tomorrow
unless somebody beats me to it. But historically, the case where
asm goto labels jump to fallthru basic block had numerous problems in the
past.
Jakub
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists