[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131009182905.GY21581@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 19:29:05 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/bridge: Add PTN3460 bridge driver
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:05:48AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2013/10/4 Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>:
> > "If PD_N is LOW, then the device is in Deep power-down completely,
> > even if supply rail is ON; for the device to be able to operate, the
> > PD_N pin must be HIGH."
> I still think the pin could be replaced with a regulator. But
> lvds-bridge node has "powerdown-gpio" property - it say this board
> will use gpio pin - specific to board. So it seems no problem.
No, don't model things that aren't regulators as regulators - it's just
confusing from a usability standpoint and causes breakage when the pins
don't behave like regulators.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists