[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131014075726.GB20435@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:57:26 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Add EFI framebuffer earlyprintk support
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 10/12/2013 10:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >>>> +static void early_efi_write_char(void *dst, char c, int h)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + const u8 *src;
> >>>> + u32 fgcolor = 0xaaaaaa;
> >>>
> >>> That's RGB grey, right? Why not 0xffffff for a very visible white?
> >>
> >> The VGA earlyprintk code uses the equivalent grey, AFAIK, which is why I
> >> picked this value.
> >
> > The VGA code should be changed to white too I suspect ;-)
> >
>
> For compatibility with the classical text console we use light grey as
> the default color and a double-stroked font (which was necessary on the
> CGA display since it didn't have enough bandwidth to handle
> single-stroked fonts well). The problem with changing that to white is
> that you end up with a mismatch between the earlyprintk console and the
> "real" console, *or* we change the behavior of everyone's consoles...
Btw., I have no problem at all with making the early console look separate
and making it clear when we switch to the 'real' console.
earlyprintk is a debug method, and more information can only be good.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists