[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ppr79cd5.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:17:42 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, acme@...stprotocols.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: mmap output file - v2
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:25:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>> No, st_size is bigger than rec->bytes_written due to the
>> perf_file_header which is written without updating rec->bytes_written.
>
> Since all this is code that executes once during __cmd_record(), is this
> all about the header writeout?
>
> That is what confused me about the stat() call and that's messy really: we
> are the ones who write the file header, we have a very good idea about how
> many bytes we wrote to the file! It should be entirely unnecessary to lose
> that information and then execute a system call to recover that
> information...
Right, I think session->header.data_offset has the info already.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists