[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131016143448.GK5643@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:34:48 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/19] clk: tegra: add common infra for DT clocks
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:01:43PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 08:52 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > Introduce a common infrastructure for sharing clock initialization between
> > SoCs.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c
>
> > +struct clk ** __init tegra_lookup_dt_id(int clk_id,
> > + struct tegra_clk *tegra_clk)
> > +{
> > + if (tegra_clk[clk_id].present)
> > + return &clks[tegra_clk[clk_id].dt_id];
> > + else
> > + return NULL;
>
> Does this need range-checking? Or do we assume that since this is an
> internal function, "clk_id" will never be out-of-range?
That was my assumption indeed. I could add a range check if you think that's
useful.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists