[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1310161034500.1264-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:36:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@...ionengravers.com>
cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] usb: ohci: remove ep93xx bus glue platform driver
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> > This is definitely not a show-stopper in any way, but since this is
> > just standard clock management, could you even move these clock ops
> > into the driver? Are any other platforms already doing similar things
> > so you could remove code from their platform that way as well, per
> > chance?
>
> It does not appear any of the other users of the ohci-platform driver do
> anything similar.
>
> The clock ops could be moved into the driver but I will need to add a
> flag or something to the usb_ohci_pdata so that the platform can
> indicated that a clock is required and the clock ops should be done.
Adding a new entry to usb_ohci_pdata would be acceptable.
However, I'm doubtful about how generic such a change would be. Some
of the platform drivers don't use any clocks, and others use more than
one. For now, it seems best to keep such dependencies in the
platform-specific code.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists