[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525E0F27.4030502@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:59:35 -0700
From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] intel_mid: Moved board related code to a new
file
On 10/15/2013 05:45 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 04:53 PM, David Cohen wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 04:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i) \
>>>> + static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
>>>> + __attribute__((__section__(".x86_intel_mid_dev.init"))) = &i
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Any reason to not just call this "sfi_device()" or something similar?
>>> "Intel MID SFI" seems a bit redundant...
>>
>> I had the same though. But struct devs_id is defined by asm/intel-mid.h.
>> This function is not meant to be used by any other user beside
>> intel-mid.
>> But I can change if you prefer.
>>
>
> Hm, I guess it doesn't really matter. After all, no other devices will
> probably ever see SFI (we hope).
I hope too :)
Let me send a new version with this change.
Br, David Cohen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists