[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525FF5E6.2090709@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:36:22 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
CC: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kishon@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: cppi41: redo descriptor collection in abort
case
On 10/17/2013 04:23 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Daniel, could please look if this solves your suspend / resume warnings?
>
> Will do (hopefully) tomorrow. So this is a replacement for my "dma:
> cppi41: move -EAGAIN in tear_down" patch, or does it go on top of it?
I applied your three patches and manage to break 2 of 4 tests I had. It
was still the same without your patch. So I made this change and merged
it back into your patch so this patch should apply ontop of your 2/3.
> How does your patch queue look like? Someone should probably re-collect
> all necessary patches for the next merge window eventually, so Vinod
> knows what to apply :)
dma: cppi41: add support for suspend and resume
dma: cppi41: restore more registers
dma: cppi41: use cppi41_pop_desc() where possible
dma: cppi41: redo descriptor collection in abort case
dma: cppi41: return code > 0 of pm_runtime_get_sync() is not an error
The first one is in Vinod's tree.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists