linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] misc: fix various misc/mic/host/ build errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:49:06 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Harshavardhan R Kharche <harshavardhan.r.kharche@...el.com>,
	Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@...el.com>,
	Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] misc: fix various misc/mic/host/ build errors

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:21:39PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 03:16:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:02:25PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:37:27PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > > > Yes, I'll do that as part of my normal tree submission process.
> > 
> > > Actually, ensuring correct merge order won't be enough, will it? That
> > > doesn't magically fixes that the function's signature actually changed.
> > 
> > > Shouldn't the update of the sysfs_get_dirent() call be fixed within the
> > > same patch that updates the sysfs_get_dirent() signature?
> > 
> > They're applied in different trees so they're both OK by themselves,
> > it's the merge that brings the two together that needs to do the fixup.
> 
> Right, as long as the person doing that merge remembers to do that. It
> sounds like the thing that could easily be forgotten. But Linus has been
> doing this for a long time, so I'm sure he'll know what to look for. I'm
> curious though, are maintainers supposed to mention it when sending pull
> requests with such a dependency?

Sometimes, if we remember, we do, sometimes we don't :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/