linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Extended H/W error log driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:33:48 -0400
From:	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, tony.luck@...el.com,
	joe@...ches.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	arozansk@...hat.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Extended H/W error log driver

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:11:17PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:11:17 +0200
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, "Chen, Gong"
>  <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, joe@...ches.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
>  arozansk@...hat.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
>  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Extended H/W error log driver
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
> 
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:00:38PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Right, the only difference I can see is that include/ras/ras_event.h
> > doesn't have those below:
> > 
> > #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> > #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE
> > #define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
> > 
> > Perhaps that is the problem?
> > 
> > Gong, what is exactly the issue you're observing?
> 
> Ok, I think I know what the issue is:
> 
> Gong has
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/extlog_trace.c b/drivers/acpi/extlog_trace.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..28640807fb09
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/extlog_trace.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
> +#include "extlog_trace.h"
> +
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH ../../include/ras
> +#include <ras/ras_event.h>
> 
> for the ras tracepoint although this is done already in
> drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> 

Sorry I don't express clearly enough. The patch [v2 9/9] in this patch
seris can work well. The bogus one is in myself reply for patch [v2 0/9].
In this patch series I keep trace interface always builtin, so it can
work for module & builtin, whether CREATE_TRACE_POINTS is defined
multi-times or not.

The weird thing for bogus patch is if it is compiled as a module, I can
find the trace_xxx function is called definitely and paramerters are
expected but nothing output via trace interface, just like below:

# tracer: nop
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 0/0   #P:120
#
#                              _-----=> irqs-off
#                             / _----=> need-resched
#                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
#                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
#                            ||| /     delay
#           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
#              | |       |   ||||       |         |


I highly suspect my trace_xxx function is compiled as an empty function
if following my bogus patch.

> Gong, can you try moving the CREATE_TRACE_POINTS line to a new file -
> arch/x86/ras/ras.c and define it there and not anywhere else, i.e. move
> it away from edac_mc.c. Does that help?

In current kernel we haven't arch/x86/ras/ras.c. You mean I create
a new one there and just add some trace macro definition?

> 
> Also, see Documentation/trace/tracepoints.txt for more info.
> 
> HTH.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
> --

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)