linux-kernel - Re: [ 3.8.y.z extended stable ] Linux 3.8.13.11 stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAErSpo5MPkySEb+tURxjh+f8p8xTi=Mnuj1W5g2=TAoXFDZ2Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:41:40 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [ 3.8.y.z extended stable ] Linux 3.8.13.11 stable review

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 11:37 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the review cycle for the Linux 3.8.13.11 stable kernel.
>>
>> Would anybody be interested in adding some sort of "stable" tag to the
>> subject lines of stable backport patches, e.g.,  instead of:
>>
>>   [PATCH 001/104] htb: fix sign extension bug
>>
>> something like:
>>
>>   [STABLE 3.8.13.11 001/104] htb: fix sign extension bug
>>
>> I don't mind having the stable patches on LKML, but it would be nice
>> if it were easier to distinguish stable backports from new patches.  I
>> know the patches are nicely threaded behind this message, but some
>> readers don't really pay attention to that.
>
> I agree that some distinction is needed, but I'm not convinced about
> that precise format.  I don't think it's worth including version
> components after the stable base version e.g. 3.2.  And I think that
> including the version is a big enough clue that this is for a stable
> branch and not mainline.
>
> So I've changed my review script to put a subject prefix of 'PATCH 3.2'
> before the patch number (and similarly in the cover letter).  But if
> there's consensus that a more explicit tag is wanted then I'll follow
> that.

Selfishly, I would just like something gmail can filter on.  I've seen
an "X-Extended-Stable: 3.8" header, which would be perfect, except
that I can't figure out how to create a gmail filter for random
headers.  So I was hoping for something stable-specific in the subject
line, but that's just to compensate for gmail's limitations.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/