[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131018154246.GB25034@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:42:46 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
Ian.Campbell@...rix.com, will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/19] arm/xen: get_dma_ops: return xen_dma_ops if
we are running as xen_initial_domain
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:22:18PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Russell,
> are you OK with this patch?
Only concern is why the change is soo large.
> > -static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> > +static inline struct dma_map_ops *__generic_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > if (dev && dev->archdata.dma_ops)
> > return dev->archdata.dma_ops;
> > return &arm_dma_ops;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (xen_initial_domain())
> > + return xen_dma_ops;
> > + else
> > + return __generic_dma_ops(dev);
> > +}
> > +
What's wrong with:
static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
{
+ if (xen_initial_domain())
+ return xen_dma_ops;
if (dev && dev->archdata.dma_ops)
return dev->archdata.dma_ops;
return &arm_dma_ops;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists