lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5260D932.8080007@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:46:10 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gleb@...hat.com, agraf@...e.de,
	chao.zhou@...el.com, magnus@...en.cx, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: fix KVM_SET_XCRS loop

Il 18/10/2013 02:04, Marcelo Tosatti ha scritto:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:50:47PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The loop was always using 0 as the index.  This means that
>> any rubbish after the first element of the array went undetected.
>> It seems reasonable to assume that no KVM userspace did that.
> 
> It is not a typo, look at __kvm_set_xcr when setting
> guest_xcrs->xcrs[i].value, with i != 0.

i is not the index of the XCR register, it's the index in the array.

The index is currently hardcoded to 0 when it is passed to
__kvm_set_xcr; but very reasonably __kvm_set_xcr returns 1 when index != 0.

IMO even the "if" in kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xcrs is wrong: setting XCR
above XCR0 should fail KVM_SET_XCRS, while currently is ignored.  The
body of the loop should be simply:

	r = __kvm_set_xcr(vcpu, guest_xcrs->xcrs[i].xcr,
			  guest_xcrs->xcrs[i].value);
	if (r)
		break;

Paolo

> The code is not prepared to deal with XCR != 0 (because its not
> implemented in hw).
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index f4e1391..f91dff2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -3062,9 +3062,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xcrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  
>>  	for (i = 0; i < guest_xcrs->nr_xcrs; i++)
>>  		/* Only support XCR0 currently */
>> -		if (guest_xcrs->xcrs[0].xcr == XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK) {
>> +		if (guest_xcrs->xcrs[i].xcr == XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK) {
>>  			r = __kvm_set_xcr(vcpu, XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK,
>> -				guest_xcrs->xcrs[0].value);
>> +				guest_xcrs->xcrs[i].value);
>>  			break;
>>  		}
>>  	if (r)
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ