[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5262AC92.3060606@hitachi.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 01:00:18 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Liuyongan <liuyongan@...wei.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Qianhuibin <qianhuibin@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: kprobe pre_handler change return IP
(2013/10/17 21:57), Liuyongan wrote:
> I use kprobe to probe a function suppose:
> int is_winter(int num) { ... }
> int replace_is_winter(int num) { ...}
> I want to replace is_winter() with replace_is_winter(), so when we call is_winter, replace_is_winter will be called.
>
> so:
> int my_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> regs->ip = (unsigned long)&replace_is_winter;
> return 1;
> }
>
> and echo 0 > /proc/sys/debug/kprobes-optimization so that jump instruction will not be used.
>
> I got a exception in fault_handler, and trap number is 14.
>
> fault_handler: p->addr = 0xffffffffa08e201a, ip = ffffffff8021c59d, trap #14n
>
> Anyone here can help me ?
If you want to replace something with kprobes, the pre_handler must clean current_kprobe up.
Actually the same thing has been done in setup_detour_execution(). So, what you need to do is
> int my_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> regs->ip = (unsigned long)&replace_is_winter;
reset_current_kprobe();
preempt_enable_no_resched();
> return 1;
> }
Happy hacking! ;)
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists