linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1816869.ggMDlA1qNY@flatron>
Date:	Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:03:26 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	rjw@...k.pl, kgene.kim@...sung.com, mturquette@...aro.org
Cc:	Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@...tner.samsung.com>,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	ben-linux@...ff.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com, swarren@...dotorg.org,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, rob@...dley.net,
	thomas.abraham@...aro.org, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	t.stanislaws@...sung.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	b.zolnierkie@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework

Hi Mike, Kukjin, Rafael,

On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 14:50:06 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
> This patch series is the new s5pv210 clock implementation
> (using common clk framework).
> 
> This implementation is compatible with device tree definition and board
> files.
> 
> This patch series is based on linux-next and has been tested on goni and
> aquila
> boards using board file.
> 
> Since v4:
> Corrected mux flags for finpll.
> 
> Since v3:
> 
> Replace s5pv210_clk_register_finpll, by creating mux finpll
> with xusbxti and xxti as parrents.
> 
> 
> Mateusz Krawczuk (3):
>   clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210
>   Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF
>   ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework
> 
>  .../bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt       |  75 +++
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig                      |   9 +
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile                     |   4 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.c                     |  17 +
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.h                     |  10 +
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c                  |   2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c              |   2 +-
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig                      |   2 +-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |   3 +
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c                  | 673
> +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c                
>  |   6 +-
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h  | 224 +++++++
>  12 files changed, 1019 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h

I believe this series is reasonable to be applied. Could we agree on
the tree it would go through and get all tne required acks?

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/