linux-kernel - Re: [ 0/7] 3.0.101-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <5261FF07.7010604@samsung.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:39:51 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 0/7] 3.0.101-stable review

On 10/18/2013 01:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> NOTE:
>    This is the LAST 3.0.x stable kernel release that I will be doing.
>    After this release, 3.0.x is End-Of-Life, please move to the 3.10.x,
>    or if you must, 3.4.x series.  For more information about longterm
>    stable releases and how long they will be maintained, please see
>    https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.101 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun Oct 20 19:50:26 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.101-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------

Patch applied cleanly 	 yes
Compile testing          passed
Boot testing 	         passed
dmesg regression testing passed
Cross-compile testing    passed

dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for 
this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions
in warn.

Test systems

     Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later)
     HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
     HP Compaq dc7700 SFF desktop: x86-64 Intel Core-i2 (cross-compile 
testing)

alpha 	defconfig 	Passed
arm 	defconfig 	not applicable
arm64 	defconfig 	Not applicable
blackfin defconfig 	Passed
c6x 	defconfig 	Not applicable
mips 	defconfig 	Passed
mipsel 	defconfig 	Passed
powerpc wii_defconfig	Passed
sh 	defconfig 	Passed
sparc 	defconfig 	Passed
tile 	tilegx_defconfig Passed 	

-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/