linux-kernel - Re: [ 0/7] 3.0.101-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131019044934.GB14996@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:49:34 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 0/7] 3.0.101-stable review

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:39:51PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 01:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > NOTE:
> >    This is the LAST 3.0.x stable kernel release that I will be doing.
> >    After this release, 3.0.x is End-Of-Life, please move to the 3.10.x,
> >    or if you must, 3.4.x series.  For more information about longterm
> >    stable releases and how long they will be maintained, please see
> >    https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.101 release.
> > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Oct 20 19:50:26 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.101-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> > -------------
> 
> Patch applied cleanly 	 yes
> Compile testing          passed
> Boot testing 	         passed
> dmesg regression testing passed
> Cross-compile testing    passed
> 
> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for 
> this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions
> in warn.

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/