lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGbDTvqC0e0wZpEYHL2kg2wGYFfZt9gx7bQQ8cmbySWHqquWqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:49:32 +0200
From:	Iago Abal <mail@...oabal.eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Iago Abal <iari@....dk>
Subject: Looking for configuration-dependent bugs in Linux

Dear Linux kernel developer,

We are a group working on analysis of configurable software systems at
IT University of Copenhagen. For the next four years [1] we will study
the problem of verification in highly configurable software, and we
will focus on the Linux kernel as the prime example of configurable
software. We will therefore appreciate your advice regarding a few
questions (see below).

We are currently looking for already-fixed configuration-dependent
bugs in Linux ---the bugfix helps us to understand the underlying
cause. A good example is [2], which fixes a bug that only shows up in
PA-RISC architectures when DISCONTIGMEM is enabled. Any bug appearing
in some configurations but not in others is interesting for us (e.g. a
bug affecting PowerPC only), even though the more complex the
interaction between configuration options the more interesting is the
bug for our purpose.

As a Linux kernel developer, could you:

* remember any configuration-dependent bug?
* identify any subset of configuration options that tend to interact badly?
* spot any part of the kernel more prone to configuration-dependent bugs?

Your feedback will allow us to make our search more effective. A good
understanding of how these bugs occur in Linux will also be important
for developing subsequent techniques and tools. There is of course a
potential benefit for the Linux community: we plan to pay you back in
bug reports :-)

All your feedback is welcomed.

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,

[1] http://variete.wikit.itu.dk/
[2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=91ea8207168793b365322be3c90a4ee9e8b03ed4

--
Iago Abal Rivas - http://www.iagoabal.eu
Ph.D. Fellow at IT University of Copenhagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ