lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvzvg-h_cRFSQ-W1bT-cgFuRwTOBFO1S842TFK-24xKqMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:45:19 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Iago Abal <mail@...oabal.eu>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Iago Abal <iari@....dk>
Subject: Re: Looking for configuration-dependent bugs in Linux

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Iago Abal <mail@...oabal.eu> wrote:
> Dear Linux kernel developer,
>
> We are a group working on analysis of configurable software systems at
> IT University of Copenhagen. For the next four years [1] we will study
> the problem of verification in highly configurable software, and we
> will focus on the Linux kernel as the prime example of configurable
> software. We will therefore appreciate your advice regarding a few
> questions (see below).
>
> We are currently looking for already-fixed configuration-dependent
> bugs in Linux ---the bugfix helps us to understand the underlying
> cause. A good example is [2], which fixes a bug that only shows up in
> PA-RISC architectures when DISCONTIGMEM is enabled. Any bug appearing
> in some configurations but not in others is interesting for us (e.g. a
> bug affecting PowerPC only), even though the more complex the
> interaction between configuration options the more interesting is the
> bug for our purpose.
>
> As a Linux kernel developer, could you:
>
> * remember any configuration-dependent bug?
> * identify any subset of configuration options that tend to interact badly?
> * spot any part of the kernel more prone to configuration-dependent bugs?

Isn't this your job?
Just read the kernel mainlinglist archives. :-)

> Your feedback will allow us to make our search more effective. A good
> understanding of how these bugs occur in Linux will also be important
> for developing subsequent techniques and tools. There is of course a
> potential benefit for the Linux community: we plan to pay you back in
> bug reports :-)
>
> All your feedback is welcomed.
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> [1] http://variete.wikit.itu.dk/
> [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=91ea8207168793b365322be3c90a4ee9e8b03ed4
>
> --
> Iago Abal Rivas - http://www.iagoabal.eu
> Ph.D. Fellow at IT University of Copenhagen
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ