linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mrst_max3110: fix SPI UART interrupt parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131023182351.GL25954@gimli>
Date:	Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:23:51 -0500
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
CC:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	<ning.li@...el.com>, <ivan.gorinov@...el.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mrst_max3110: fix SPI UART interrupt parameters

Hi again,

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:21:43PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:10:48AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > >My idea is always use threaded irq and passing flags into request.
> > >Like as:
> > >unsigned long flags = res->flags & IORESOURCE_BITS;
> > >...
> > >request_threaded_irq(max->irq, serial_m3110_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT | flags, "max3110", max);
> > 
> > 
> > Oh, maybe we were talking about different things afterall :)
> > The reason this struct plat_max3110 was created is to allow platform
> > code (located under arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/) to define
> > the irq edge type.
> > When I saw your comment I though you were referring to struct resource
> > (which has IORESOURCE_IRQ_* flags). But unlike platform_device,
> > spi_device has no struct resource * to replace the need of struct
> > plat_max3110.
> > 
> > OTOH your suggestion can replace this piece of code:
> > 
> > @@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ struct uart_max3110 {
> >         u8 clock;
> >         u8 parity, word_7bits;
> >         u16 irq;
> > +       u16 irq_edge_triggered;
> 
> max3110 is already edge triggered:
> 
> 495                 ret = request_irq(max->irq, serial_m3110_irq,
> 496                                 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING, "max3110", max);
> 
> it would be nice a threaded IRQ instead of using a singlethread
> workqueue, though.

making it clearer, you only converted to threaded IRQ when
edge_triggered isn't set, why don't you *always* use threaded IRQs ?

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)