[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo7e0i=5Yi90rtwfR7MrOpUR3BVkb_neWfdtXJ4=rRyZ8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:27:05 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Frank Haverkamp <haver@...t.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
utz.bacher@...ibm.com, jsvogt@...ibm.com, MIJUNG@...ibm.com,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
michael@...ra.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic WorkQueue Engine (GenWQE) device driver
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Frank Haverkamp <haver@...t.ibm.com> wrote:
> The GenWQE card provides access to a generic work queue into which the
> work can be put, which should be executed, e.g. compression or
> decompression request, or whatever the card was configured to do.
>
> Each request comes with a set of input data (ASV) and will produce some
> output data (ASIV). The request will also contain a sequence number,
> some timestamps and a command code/subcode plus some fields for hardware-/
> software-interaction.
>
> A request can contain references to blocks of memory. Since the card
> requires DMA-addresses of that memory, the driver provides two ways to
> solve that task:
> 1) The drivers mmap() will allocate some DMAable memory for the user.
> The driver has a lookup table such that the virtual userspace
> address can properly be replaced and checked.
> 2) The user allocates memory and the driver will pin/unpin that
> memory and setup a scatter gatherlist with matching DMA addresses.
>
> Currently work requests are synchronous.
>
> The genwqe driver has a user-space interface described in
> linux/include/genwqe/genwqe_card.h. There are several ioctls which can
> be used to talk to the driver. In addition there are some sysfs
> entries where information can be exchanged with user-space.
>
> Known Restrictions:
>
> o On my PowerPC testsystem SRIOV did not work.
Does this restriction still apply? Is there some PCI core issue here?
We did fix an SR-IOV issue that was reported on PowerPC with
aa914f5ec25, so maybe that's related. But if there's still a PCI core
issue here, let me know.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists