linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Generic WorkQueue Engine (GenWQE) device driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131024095625.GB12663@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:56:25 +0100
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, haver@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Frank Haverkamp <haver@...t.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	utz.bacher@...ibm.com, jsvogt@...ibm.com, MIJUNG@...ibm.com,
	cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, michae@...per.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic WorkQueue Engine (GenWQE) device driver

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:15:25AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > > On 23.10.2013 16:14, Frank Haverkamp wrote:
> > > > of course you are right. Let me try again.
> > > > 
> > > > I hope this looks better now:
> > > > + dev_info(&pci_dev->dev, "GenWQE driver version: %s %s%u\n",
> > > > + DRV_VERS_STRING, GENWQE_DEVNAME, cd->card_idx);
> > > > ...
> > 
> > Also, _no_ driver should ever be doing this type of "hey, look at me,
> > I'm now loaded!" type syslog spam anymore.  It's pointless, and should
> > be abolished where ever possible.  That's one reason we have moved to
> > the driver init type functions that make this impossible to do, and if
> > possible, I recommend doing that here as well.
> > 
> I agree. Do we have that as a general policy written down somewhere ?
> That would help in reviews with authors insisting that they absolutely
> want such messages. 

So, you want something written down that no one will ever read?  :)

Seriously, just push back, there's no reason we should ever take such
crud.  That's one reason those new macros are there, the side benefit of
cleaning up code and removing lines was just a cover story...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/