[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131024122748.GC6539@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:27:48 -0300
From: Arnaldo Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf session: Add option to copy events when queueing
Em Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:23:32AM +0100, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 10/24/13 10:30 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >Bah, checking that again, there don't seem to be a bug there. Actually
> >the sample buffer is reset after we pick the last entry. So it looks
> >all fine. I got confused as usual. Nevermind.
>
> Ok. I had not come back to this thread since I decided on a
> different route for the event copying. I'll take it out of my to-do
> list.
Can you elaborate on that?
I had this feeling that perhaps we could defer copying the event till it
would be overwritten, something like making a range read only and then
when the event would be _really_ consumed the tooling would mark it as
so... Have to think about it more tho :-\
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists