linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/149] 3.2.52-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1382617925.21018.0.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:32:05 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/149] 3.2.52-rc1 review

On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 08:25 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.52 release.
> > There are 149 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri Oct 25 08:00:00 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > A combined patch relative to 3.2.51 will be posted as an additional
> > response to this.  A shortlog and diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> Build results look good:
> 	total: 100 pass: 78 skipped: 14 fail: 8
> 
> which is four less failures than with 3.2.51 (m68k-nommu builds now all pass).
> 
> qemu build and load tests all pass.

Thanks for testing.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)