[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131024125032.GA21286@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:50:32 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Export __smp_call_function_single()
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:16:53AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > The blk-mq core and the blk-mq null driver uses it.
> >
> > Can't say I really like exporting it as all users will need a major
> > ifdef mess. If at all we'd expose the higher level add to llist and ipi
> > abstraction that both blk-mq and the null_blk driver use.
> >
> > For now I'd just suggest removing the NULL_IRQ_SOFTIRQ mode from
> > null_blk and decouple that from blk-mq itself. I'll try to cook up such
> > an abstraction in the meantime.
>
> Agree, lets get a proper interface exported for this from kernel/smp.c
> instead. I've killed this patch and the softirq mode in null_blk for
> now.
Turns out the proper interface is __smp_call_function_single as long as
we make sure it's always available. I've got a series that allows us to
use it directly without the llist wrapping, but it probably won't be
ready for the next merge window.
So I'll take my earlier objection back, instead please add a:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists